SOC 2 Compliance Guide: Type 1 vs Type 2, Trust Services Criteria and Timeline
What SOC 2 really is, how Type 1 and Type 2 reports differ, the 5 Trust Services Criteria, and a realistic step-by-step path from first gap assessment to your report.
SOC 2 compliance means a licensed CPA firm has examined your controls against the AICPA's Trust Services Criteria and issued a report. A Type 1 report checks control design at a single date; a Type 2 report also tests whether controls worked over a period. Security is required; availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy are optional.
Photo: Unsplash
On this page
A big prospect loves your product. Then their procurement team sends a security questionnaire with one line in bold: “Please provide your most recent SOC 2 Type 2 report.” If you don’t have one, the deal stalls.
That’s how most companies meet SOC 2 compliance. It isn’t a law, but for B2B software and service companies it has become a common way for customers to judge whether you can be trusted with their data. This guide explains what SOC 2 is, the difference between Type 1 and Type 2, the Trust Services Criteria, and the steps and timeline to get your first report.
What SOC 2 is (and what it isn’t)
SOC stands for System and Organization Controls. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) describes SOC as a suite of services CPAs provide to report on controls at service organizations, helping customers assess the risks of outsourcing to them.
A few points trip people up:
- It’s an attestation report, not a certification. A licensed CPA firm examines your controls and issues an opinion. There’s no SOC 2 “certificate” from the AICPA.
- You design the controls. The criteria describe outcomes. You decide which policies, processes and tools achieve them.
- Reports are usually shared under NDA. SOC 2 reports contain detail about your systems and go to customers and prospects who need them.
- SOC 2 is one of several SOC reports. SOC 1 covers controls relevant to customers’ financial reporting. SOC 3 uses the same criteria as SOC 2 but is a shorter report meant for general distribution.
SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2
| Type 1 | Type 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| What it evaluates | Whether controls are suitably designed | Design plus whether controls operated effectively |
| Timeframe | As of a specified date | Throughout a specified period |
| Auditor testing | Walkthroughs and inspection of design | Testing samples of evidence across the period |
| Time to obtain | Faster | Longer, because the period must elapse |
| What customers prefer | Accepted as a first step | Usually what enterprise buyers ask for |
| Typical use | First report, fast proof of progress | Ongoing, usually renewed each year |
The AICPA’s Journal of Accountancy summarizes the difference: a Type 1 looks at design “as of a specified date,” while a Type 2 also covers operating effectiveness “throughout a specified period” and includes a description of the auditor’s tests and results.
Many companies get a Type 1 first to satisfy early deals, then move to Type 2. Others skip straight to Type 2 if their controls are already mature. Agree the observation period with your auditor; it’s commonly several months long.
Key takeaway: A Type 1 proves you designed the right controls. A Type 2 proves they actually worked over time, which is why most enterprise buyers ask for it.
The 5 Trust Services Criteria
SOC 2 examinations use the AICPA’s 2017 Trust Services Criteria, which the AICPA reissued with revised points of focus in 2022. The categories and criteria themselves didn’t change in that update; the points of focus are guidance on how criteria might be met.
| Category | What it covers | Required? |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Protection against unauthorized access, disclosure and damage to systems and data | Always included |
| Availability | Systems are available for operation and use as committed | Optional |
| Processing integrity | Processing is complete, valid, accurate, timely and authorized | Optional |
| Confidentiality | Information designated as confidential is protected | Optional |
| Privacy | Personal information is collected, used, retained, disclosed and disposed of properly | Optional |
The Security category holds the “common criteria,” which cover areas like the control environment, risk assessment, monitoring, logical and physical access, system operations, change management and risk mitigation. Every SOC 2 report includes them.
Choose optional categories based on what you promise customers. If you sell uptime commitments, add availability. If you process transactions, consider processing integrity. If you handle personal data in ways customers care about, consider privacy. Adding categories increases scope and work, so don’t add them just because you can.
The AICPA also publishes mappings from the Trust Services Criteria to other frameworks such as NIST SP 800-53, which helps if you already follow another standard.
Who needs SOC 2
You likely need SOC 2 if you:
- Sell SaaS or cloud services to other businesses.
- Store, process or transmit customer data on their behalf.
- Provide managed IT, security, payroll, data analytics or similar outsourced services.
- Keep losing time on long security questionnaires.
If you’re a buyer, asking vendors for SOC 2 reports is a practical part of choosing partners; our guide to choosing a managed IT service provider shows how to use them.
Healthcare companies often need both SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance. They overlap, but one doesn’t replace the other.
Common controls auditors expect
Every company’s controls differ, but most first-time SOC 2 programs include these:
| Area | Typical controls |
|---|---|
| Governance | Security policies, assigned roles, board or leadership oversight, annual policy review |
| People | Background checks where lawful, security training, onboarding and offboarding checklists |
| Access | SSO, MFA, least privilege, quarterly access reviews, prompt removal of leavers |
| Change management | Code review, approvals, separated environments, deployment logs |
| Operations | Logging and monitoring, vulnerability scanning, patching, incident response plan |
| Vendors | Vendor inventory, risk reviews, contracts with security terms |
| Resilience | Backups, restore tests, business continuity and disaster recovery plans |
| Data | Encryption in transit and at rest, data classification, retention and disposal |
Strong identity controls carry a lot of weight. If you’re modernizing logins, see our guides to passkeys and zero trust security.
SOC 2 timeline and steps
Timelines depend on your starting maturity, the categories in scope and whether you choose Type 1 or Type 2. Here’s the typical path.
Step 1: define scope
Decide which products, systems, locations, teams and Trust Services Criteria categories are in scope. Narrower scope means a faster first report.
Step 2: run a readiness or gap assessment
Compare current practices to the criteria. Many CPA firms and consultants offer readiness assessments; some companies use compliance automation software to map controls and collect evidence.
Step 3: close the gaps
Write missing policies, turn on MFA and logging, formalize access reviews, document change management, and train staff. This is usually the longest phase for first-timers.
Step 4: choose your CPA firm
Only a licensed CPA firm can issue a SOC 2 report. Ask about experience with companies like yours, peer review status, timeline, and how they gather evidence. The AICPA has publicly said it was looking into allegations about a compliance vendor’s SOC practices and that SOC services should be thoroughly evaluated, so check your auditor’s credentials.
Step 5: Type 1 examination or start the Type 2 period
For a Type 1, the auditor tests design as of a date. For a Type 2, your controls must operate through the observation period while you keep evidence.
Step 6: fieldwork and report
The auditor tests controls, raises any exceptions and issues the report with management’s assertion and a description of your system.
Step 7: maintain and renew
SOC 2 isn’t one-and-done. Customers expect a current report, so most companies run a new Type 2 period each year.
How SOC 2 compares with other frameworks
Customers sometimes ask for other frameworks alongside or instead of SOC 2. Here’s how the common ones differ at a high level.
| Framework | What it is | Who issues it | Where it’s common |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 | Attestation report on controls against the Trust Services Criteria | Licensed CPA firm | US B2B and SaaS buyers |
| ISO/IEC 27001 | International standard for an information security management system | Accredited certification body | International and enterprise buyers |
| HIPAA | US law protecting health information | No certification; enforced by HHS | Healthcare and health tech |
| NIST frameworks | Government-published security guidance and control catalogs | Self-assessed or assessed by third parties | Government suppliers and regulated industries |
There’s a lot of overlap. Access control, logging, risk assessment, vendor management and incident response show up in all of them. If you plan to pursue more than one, map your controls once and reuse the evidence, which is where the AICPA’s published mappings help.
What SOC 2 costs
Costs vary by firm, scope, company size and readiness, so be wary of any flat number. Expect to pay for some mix of:
- Auditor fees for the Type 1 or Type 2 examination.
- Readiness help from consultants or the audit firm’s advisory arm.
- Compliance automation software, usually a subscription.
- Security tools you may need to add, such as endpoint protection, logging or MFA.
- Internal time, which is often the largest hidden cost.
Ask 2 or 3 CPA firms for proposals using the same scope to compare fairly.
Conclusion
SOC 2 compliance is a sales tool as much as a security program. Start with a tight scope and the Security category, close gaps with controls you’ll actually keep running, and choose a reputable CPA firm. A Type 1 can unblock early deals, but plan for Type 2, because that’s the report enterprise customers trust. New to the terms? Our glossary explains them.
Sources
- AICPA: System and Organization Controls (SOC) suite of services — what SOC reports are, CPA role, and the notice on evaluating SOC service providers
- AICPA: 2017 Trust Services Criteria (With Revised Points of Focus — 2022) — the 5 categories used in SOC 2 examinations
- Journal of Accountancy (AICPA): Explaining the 3 faces of SOC — Type 1 vs Type 2 and SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3 differences
- AICPA: Mapping of 2017 Trust Services Criteria to NIST 800-53 — framework mappings
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2?
A SOC 2 Type 1 report evaluates whether your controls are suitably designed as of a specific date. A Type 2 report evaluates design and whether controls operated effectively throughout a period, with the auditor testing evidence across that time. Type 1 is faster to get and useful as a first step, but most enterprise customers ask for Type 2.
How long does it take to get SOC 2 compliant?
It depends on your starting maturity, scope and report type. Companies with few formal controls spend most of their time closing gaps before the audit. A Type 1 can follow soon after readiness, while a Type 2 also requires an observation period, commonly several months, before the auditor can finish testing. Agree the period and timeline with your CPA firm early.
Is SOC 2 required by law?
No, SOC 2 isn't required by any US law. It's a voluntary attestation report based on AICPA standards. In practice, many enterprise customers require it in contracts or procurement, especially for SaaS and service providers handling their data. Some regulated industries have separate legal requirements, such as HIPAA for health data, that SOC 2 doesn't replace.
What are the 5 Trust Services Criteria?
The 5 Trust Services Criteria categories are security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality and privacy. They come from the AICPA's 2017 Trust Services Criteria, reissued with revised points of focus in 2022. Security, which contains the common criteria, is included in every SOC 2 report. The other 4 are optional and chosen based on the commitments you make to customers.
Who can perform a SOC 2 audit?
Only a licensed CPA firm can perform a SOC 2 examination and issue the report. Consultants and compliance software vendors can help you prepare, but they can't issue the opinion. When choosing an auditor, check licensing and peer review status, experience with companies like yours, and how they collect evidence, since the AICPA has urged careful evaluation of SOC service providers.
How much does SOC 2 cost?
SOC 2 cost varies by audit firm, scope, company size, number of criteria categories and readiness, so there's no reliable flat price. Budget for auditor fees, possible readiness consulting, compliance automation software, any new security tools, and significant internal staff time. Get proposals from 2 or 3 CPA firms using the same scope to compare fairly.
What is the difference between SOC 2 and SOC 3?
SOC 2 and SOC 3 use the same Trust Services Criteria, but SOC 2 is a detailed report usually shared with customers under NDA, while SOC 3 is a shorter general-use report that can be posted publicly. Many companies get a SOC 2 for customer due diligence and a SOC 3 for their website or marketing.
Is SOC 2 a certification?
No, SOC 2 isn't a certification. It's an attestation report in which a licensed CPA firm gives an opinion on your controls against the Trust Services Criteria. People often say "SOC 2 certified" informally, but the accurate phrase is that you have a SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2 report covering a specific scope and date or period.
Was this guide useful
No reviews yet. Share your experience and help other readers.